CPLR 308(5) provides that the Court may authorize an alternative form of service when the methods set forth in subsection (1), (2), and (4) are impracticable. This requirement is illustrated in the recent decision of Suber v. Churchill Owners Corp., 2022 N.Y. Slip. Op. 32990(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Sept. 7, 2022), where plaintiff filed a motion to serve certain defendants through email or social media. The Court rejected the motion, concluding that plaintiff failed to provide any support that she engaged in prior attempts of personal service.
If you have any questions about effectuating service of process, please contact Michael Rakower or Melissa Yang.
Suber
